Nolte: Nepo-Senator Lisa Murkowski's Office Responds to James O'Keefe Journalism with Legal Threats
Nolte attacks Murkowski’s opposition to the SAVE America Act and her office’s response to O’Keefe’s video.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYBreitbart is rated 41 by the site, and the page is an explicitly opinionated column rather than straight reporting. The author is identified, but this article’s openly partisan language and limited independent verification support a low-to-moderate institutional score.
- Source type — Published as an opinion column, which lowers confidence in neutral reporting.
- Track record — The site's rating is 41 based on 230 stories.
- Author attribution — The author, John Nolte, is named.
- Editorial standards — The article uses openly derisive labels and presents serious claims without independent verification in the text.
The piece includes a quoted statement from Murkowski’s state director and describes the video’s reported encounters, but relies heavily on the author’s assertions and loaded interpretation. It offers little verification or relevant counter-perspective, and treats claims about fraud and the office’s motives as established without demonstrating them.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article is openly argumentative and overwhelmingly advances O’Keefe’s interpretation. It includes Waller’s quoted response, but does not provide substantial competing context or examine whether the reported encounters demonstrate fraud.
- Counterarguments presented — Waller’s statement is quoted, but no fuller response or competing account is presented.
- Loaded language — The article repeatedly uses insulting and accusatory language.
- Source diversity — The account centers on O’Keefe’s video and the columnist’s interpretation.
- Omitted context — The text does not establish whether the reported incidents resulted in ballots being cast or explain the applicable election procedures.
The column uses strongly derogatory language about Murkowski and her office, endorses O’Keefe’s account, and frames the dispute as truth-tellers versus a corrupt establishment. Its framing and word choice are strongly right-leaning.
- Language tone — Uses labels such as “Useless Nepo-Senator” and “RINO” and characterizes the office as attacking journalism.
- Framing — Presents O’Keefe as a truth-teller and Murkowski’s response as protection of a flawed system.
- Source selection — Relies on O’Keefe’s video and quoted statement, without a substantive response from Murkowski’s office beyond Waller’s message.
Breitbart columnist John Nolte says Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s office responded to James O’Keefe’s video about Alaska voting procedures by seeking information for a complaint. The article criticizes Murkowski and her office, but does not independently establish that voter fraud occurred.
The article says James O’Keefe released a video after an encounter at an Anchorage polling place during Alaska’s primary. It reports that O’Keefe said he was Lisa Murkowski’s brother and lacked identification, and that another reporter said she was Murkowski state director Karina Waller and received a ballot. The article also says Brian Murkowski remains on Alaska’s voter rolls despite no longer living in the state.
Murkowski’s state director, Karina Waller, wrote that someone from O’Keefe’s organization had impersonated her at a polling place and asked O’Keefe to provide that person’s name for a complaint to state authorities. O’Keefe said his organization stood by its reporting. Nolte criticizes Murkowski’s opposition to the SAVE America Act and portrays her office’s response as an attack on journalism.
Community verdict
2 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator criticized for opposing the SAVE America Act and for her office’s response to O’Keefe’s reporting
Governor mentioned in a comparison
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 3
- OUTLETS
- 2
- AVG CRED
- 43
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

