Bernie Sanders Says Graham Platner Has 'Guts,' Despite Scandals
Platner is the Maine Senate candidate Sanders defended amid scrutiny of his tattoo and resurfaced Reddit posts.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYBreitbart is recorded as an opinion source, and the article uses strongly evaluative language. It names an author and attributes Sanders’s remarks to Fox News, but the article itself provides little independent sourcing or corroboration.
- Source type — Opinion-source classification lowers confidence in detached institutional reporting.
- Editorial standards — Loaded descriptions frame the campaign and the candidate negatively.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Transparency — Sanders’s comments are attributed to Fox News, but the article offers little sourcing for the other claims.
The article includes direct quotations and attributes Sanders’s remarks, but gives little detail about the origins or context of the resurfaced posts and no meaningful response to most of the claims. Its strongly evaluative wording further limits its reporting quality.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Sanders’s defense and Platner’s denial concerning the tattoo, but gives little context or response to the other reported posts and allegations.
- Counterarguments presented — Platner’s denial about the tattoo is included, but other claims receive no response from him.
- Loaded language — Repeated pejorative language presents the story in a critical frame.
- Source diversity — The piece offers limited sourcing beyond Sanders’s comments and references to posts and video.
- Omitted context — It gives little detail about the timing, context or verification of the resurfaced material.
The article frames Platner’s campaign and Sanders’s defense through pejorative descriptions and emphasizes damaging material, with little context beyond Platner’s denial about the tattoo.
- Language tone — Terms such as “scandal-ridden,” “nightmare” and “skeletons in Platner’s closet” are strongly negative.
- Framing — Sanders’s defense is immediately set against an extended account of damaging allegations and posts.
- Source selection — The article relies on Sanders’s reported comments and critical material, with little additional perspective.
- Headline — The headline contrasts Sanders’s praise with Platner’s scandals.
Bernie Sanders defended Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, saying billionaires oppose him because he challenges their influence. The article juxtaposes Sanders’s comments with reports about Platner’s tattoo and resurfaced Reddit posts, while noting the state’s upcoming Democratic primary.
Sanders said billionaires had pledged to spend $90 million in Maine and argued Platner has the “guts” to fight big-money interests, support health care as a human right and demand higher taxes on billionaires. Sanders also urged attention to issues facing working families and expressed hope that Platner and his wife would work on their marriage. The article attributes his comments to a Fox News report.
The article recounts scrutiny of Platner’s Nazi-linked tattoo and resurfaced Reddit posts, including posts mocking a wounded U.S. soldier and making derogatory comments about police, rural residents and sexual-assault victims. Platner denied being a Nazi and said he would not have kept the tattoo if he had known its significance. The article says Janet Mills ended her campaign in April and that Platner would face Susan Collins in November if he wins the primary.
Community verdict
6 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Maine Senate candidate discussed in connection with campaign controversies
Incumbent senator and prospective general-election opponent
Senator who endorsed Platner
Former Democratic primary opponent of Platner
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




