Six of 11 Massachusetts congress members score 'F' grades in integrity: Group
The index gave Moulton an F, while his campaign challenged its assessments and said he moved family investments into a blind trust.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Boston Herald is an established regional newspaper, and the article identifies its author and attributes key claims to the index, campaign representatives and filings. The piece relies heavily on the index and offers limited direct responses from most of the members discussed.
- Track record — Established regional newspaper with a record of local and state reporting.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes key statements and figures, though much of the financial assessment is sourced to one index.
- Transparency — The story identifies the Political Integrity Project and references FEC filings, but does not link or detail all underlying records in the article text.
The article supplies specific figures, attributes the index’s assessments, includes statements from Markey and Moulton’s campaign, and reports an explanation from Auchincloss’s staff. Its sourcing is uneven: most member-specific findings rely on the index, and responses from most of the members graded are absent.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents the index’s findings and competing statements from Markey and Moulton’s campaign, and includes an explanation from Auchincloss’s staff. It does not provide direct responses from most of the members who received low grades or much independent examination of the index’s methodology.
- Counterarguments presented — Markey and Moulton’s campaign make opposing claims about each other’s records; Auchincloss’s staff offers an explanation for his stock holdings.
- Source diversity — The index, campaign sources, staff and FEC filings are referenced, but most findings originate with the index.
- Omitted context — Most members graded do not have a response represented, and the index methodology is not explored in depth.
- Loaded language — Some sharp language appears in attributed campaign remarks rather than the reporter’s narration.
The article mostly reports the index’s grades and financial figures with attribution, while presenting statements from both Markey and Moulton’s campaign. Its framing does not consistently favor either side of their dispute.
- Language tone — Primarily descriptive language, with critical characterizations attributed to sources.
- Source selection — Includes statements from Markey and Moulton’s campaign, alongside the index’s assessments and reported filings.
- Framing — Presents the delegation-wide grades and then details a dispute involving two political rivals.
The Political Integrity Index gave six Massachusetts House members failing grades, citing stock holdings and corporate PAC contributions. The article focuses especially on Seth Moulton’s dispute with Sen. Ed Markey over the index’s assessments and their records on those issues.
The Political Integrity Index gave Reps. Seth Moulton, Jake Auchincloss, Richard Neal, Stephen Lynch, Katherine Clark and Bill Keating failing grades, primarily based on stock trading and corporate PAC contributions. The article reports the index’s scores and financial figures for the six members; Auchincloss’s staff said his State Street shares came through his wife’s compensation portfolio, while the index attributed Neal’s F grade to corporate PAC contributions despite his having no stocks.
Moulton’s campaign disputed the index’s treatment of him and Markey, and said Moulton moved family investments into a blind trust. Markey said he does not take corporate PAC money and called for a congressional stock-trading ban. The article cites FEC filings showing Markey received contributions from three corporate PACs during the cycle, and reports that the index gave Markey an A-minus.
Community verdict
8 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative whose index grade and financial disclosures are discussed; his campaign challenged the index’s assessments of him and Markey.
Senator whose index grade and financial record are challenged by Moulton’s campaign.
Markey's version of this story ↗Representative whose index grade was attributed to corporate PAC contributions.
Representative whose index grade is briefly reported.
Representative whose index grade, corporate PAC contributions and stock holdings are reported.
Representative whose index grade, contributions and stock holdings are reported.
Representative whose index grade is briefly reported.
Representative and House Minority Whip whose index grade and financial figures are reported.
Representative whose index grade, stock holdings and campaign contributions are reported.
Representative whose index grade is briefly reported.
Senator whose index grade is briefly reported.
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…










