Howie Carr: Graham Platner goosesteps to his own drummer
The column attacks Platner’s background and past remarks as evidence that he is an unsuitable Senate candidate.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Boston Herald is an established regional newspaper, and the column has a named author. This is an opinion piece rather than original reported journalism, and its institutional credibility does not establish the column’s allegations.
- Source type — Established regional newspaper; the local-news classification supports a solid institutional baseline.
- Author attribution — The column is attributed to Howie Carr.
- Editorial standards — The publisher is an established outlet, but this is a strongly opinionated column rather than a reported article.
- Transparency — The author and publisher are identified; the text does not provide documentation for many of its claims.
The column makes numerous serious claims about Platner’s background and conduct but offers little documentary support or response from him. Its argument relies heavily on ridicule and provides no meaningful counterperspective.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a one-sided attack column, dominated by insults and allegations without a substantive response from Platner or meaningful countervailing context.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Platner or defense of his record is included.
- Loaded language — The column uses sustained insults, mockery and Nazi-themed wordplay.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an openly argumentative opinion column.
- Source diversity — The only quoted voice is used to reinforce the column’s criticism.
The column is strongly hostile to Democratic candidate Graham Platner and uses partisan language to contrast him with Republican Sen. Susan M. Collins. Its framing and insults signal a pronounced right-leaning perspective.
- Language tone — Repeated insults and Nazi-themed mockery cast Platner as contemptible.
- Framing — The column presents Platner as emblematic of Democratic failure and endorses Collins in its closing lines.
- Source selection — It cites a single critical quote and presents no supportive or balancing perspective from Platner.
- Headline — The headline uses a mocking reference to Platner.
A sharply critical opinion column attacks Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner over his Nazi-symbol tattoo, past online remarks and claims about his background. It closes by urging voters to choose Sen. Susan M. Collins instead.
The column portrays Platner as an unsuitable Democratic Senate candidate, citing his tattoo previously recognized as a Nazi symbol, offensive comments he allegedly left on Reddit, and claims about his working-class identity, oyster-farming business and home purchase. It also invokes rumors about his time at Hotchkiss School, without establishing them as fact.
The author uses ridicule and Nazi-themed wordplay throughout, and quotes former Biden White House aide Yemesi Egbewole describing Platner’s working-class image as a “Halloween costume.” The column ends with the assertion that Mainers vote for Collins and “Maniacs vote for” Platner.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Platner in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Platner’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Senate candidate criticized for his background, past online remarks and Nazi-symbol tattoo.
Senator invoked in the column’s closing contrast with Platner.
Former president identified through the White House where Egbewole served.
California Democrat mentioned in a joke about his memoir.
Part of a bigger story
26 OUTLETSOutlets report that Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner is facing scrutiny over a Nazi-associated tattoo, past online posts, reported sexual messages and other conduct. He has denied some allegations, while Democratic figures have continued to support him. Left-leaning outlets pair reporting on allegations and Platner’s response with a warning that internal attacks could help Republicans. Center outlets focus on the allegations, responses and divisions among Democrats, including criticism alongside continued support. Right-leaning outlets foreground damaging claims and frame continued Democratic backing as a political risk or a test of party standards.
- ARTICLES
- 49
- OUTLETS
- 26
- AVG CRED
- 59
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




