Stu Burguiere reveals the 'worst part' of Graham Platner's sexting scandal: 'The part that's going to turn your stomach'
The segment focuses on allegations about Platner’s sexting and online activity.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYBlaze Media is a partisan outlet, and this piece is a host-led commentary segment rather than independently documented reporting. The hosts make serious claims without presenting documents, direct interviews, or a response from Platner.
- Source type — Partisan outlet; this page presents a host-led commentary segment.
- Source diversity — The discussion relies on the hosts’ accounts and does not present a range of sources.
- Editorial standards — The segment does not show independent corroboration or include a response from Platner.
- Transparency — The page identifies the program and attributes remarks to its hosts.
The piece attributes its claims to the hosts but offers little verifiable supporting evidence, no response from Platner, and no meaningful counterview. It also uses insinuation about Kik without reporting evidence that Platner contacted children.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The segment is strongly one-sided: it emphasizes damaging allegations through the hosts’ commentary without including Platner’s response or independent corroboration.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Platner or countervailing account is included.
- Loaded language — The hosts use mocking and sensational descriptions of the allegations.
- Source diversity — The segment relies on the two hosts and does not independently document its claims.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is presented as commentary rather than neutral reporting.
The segment frames Platner as a subject of ridicule and uses sensational language to emphasize damaging allegations. It offers no countervailing account or response.
- Language tone — Uses mocking and sensational phrasing, including the hosts’ descriptions of the story as bizarre and stomach-turning.
- Framing — Frames the revelations as further evidence against a Democratic Senate candidate.
- Source selection — Relies on the hosts’ commentary and secondhand descriptions of the allegations.
- Omission — Includes no response from Platner or other balancing perspective.
BlazeTV hosts Stu Burguiere and Dave Landau discuss allegations that Senate candidate Graham Platner sexted other women while married and describe a profile linked to him on Kik. The segment presents the allegations in mocking, critical terms and does not include Platner’s response.
Burguiere says Platner’s wife told the campaign in spring 2025 that she had found messages indicating he had been sexting other women. He says an aide later made the information more public after being fired amid an earlier controversy over Platner’s tattoo. The segment also refers to controversial Reddit posts attributed to Platner’s account.
Burguiere says a Kik profile attributed to Platner included a shirtless mirror selfie and highlights its user ID. He characterizes Kik as an app used by child predators, but the segment does not report that Platner contacted children or provide a response from him.
Community verdict
4 VOTESPeople in this story
Senate candidate discussed in connection with allegations about his conduct and online accounts
Part of a bigger story
27 OUTLETSGraham Platner, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Maine, faced scrutiny over reports about his past conduct during his campaign. Left-leaning outlets focus on questions about his political viability and defenses made on his behalf. Center outlets emphasize Democratic responses, voter views and the race’s stakes. Right-leaning outlets more often present the allegations as evidence against Platner and criticize Democrats who continue to support him, though some also report voter backing.
- ARTICLES
- 38
- OUTLETS
- 27
- AVG CRED
- 57
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

