Republicans keep losing because they won't take hostages
The author argues that Thune should use his influence to secure a vote on the SAVE America Act.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYBlaze Media’s recorded publisher rating is 47, and the page is a clearly labeled opinion column rather than independent news reporting. The named author and transparent presentation provide some accountability, but the argument relies largely on the author’s assertions.
- Track record — The site's rating from 49 stories is 47, indicating below-average assessed credibility.
- Source type — The publisher is categorized as national news, but this particular page is an opinion column.
- Author attribution — The column names Mike Howell as its author.
- Transparency — The article is clearly identified as opinion in its URL and framing.
The column makes a clear argument and includes specific claims about Senate leadership, fundraising totals, and a floor vote. However, it offers little independent sourcing or response from the people it criticizes, and presents much of its interpretation as the author's own assertion.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a one-sided opinion column advocating a particular strategy. It quotes Thune and Tillis briefly but does not meaningfully develop the opposing case or seek responses to its claims about leadership and donor influence.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an argument urging conservatives to take specific political action.
- Counterarguments presented — Leadership's stated position is mentioned, but not developed as a counterargument.
- Source diversity — Few perspectives are represented beyond the author's and a brief quotation from Tillis.
- Loaded language — The article uses combative language and strongly critical characterizations.
The column strongly advocates for conservative priorities and criticizes Republican Senate leadership for not applying enough pressure to secure the SAVE America Act. Its language and framing are openly partisan rather than neutral.
- Language tone — Uses emphatic and adversarial phrasing, including calls to stop asking nicely and to engage in a cage fight.
- Framing — Frames Republican leaders as obstructing conservative priorities and urges conservatives to use leverage against them.
- Source selection — Relies mainly on the author's assertions and a quote from Sen. Thomas Tillis, without presenting leadership's full case.
The author argues that Republican leaders, especially John Thune, are not using their leverage to advance the SAVE America Act. He urges conservatives to withhold support for other Senate priorities until the bill receives a vote.
The author says Republicans have limited time with unified control and argues that the SAVE America Act’s election rules, including voter ID and limits on mail-in voting, are important priorities. He criticizes Senate leadership for supporting senators who oppose the bill and says money and control of floor time could be used to pressure them.
Community verdict
5 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senate majority leader criticized for not using leadership resources and floor time to advance the SAVE America Act
Attorney General whose confirmation the article says Republicans delayed
South Carolina representative identified as an original SAVE America Act co-sponsor and a rival for leadership-network support
Senator cited as having used leverage to secure funding for Alaska nonprofits
Senator whose narrower photo-ID bill the Senate considered
South Carolina senator whom the article calls Darline Graham Nordone and says the leadership network supports over Ralph Norman
Senator quoted saying the SAVE America Act lacks the votes to pass
Senator who leads the National Republican Senatorial Committee, described as part of the leadership-aligned funding network
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








