The fight over who pays for AI's power boom
Liccardo supported protecting consumers but argued the House bill would have little practical effect without stronger requirements.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYOutlet credibility · Axios88/100 HIGH
134 stories · 87–89 · updated Sep 25, 2026
This article1 analysis · Sep 21, 2026
SOURCEAxios
Published Sep 18, 2026
tl;dr
Reps. Robert Latta and Sam Liccardo debated who should pay for infrastructure needed to serve expanding AI data centers. Latta backed a House bill protecting existing ratepayers, while Liccardo called it ineffective and proposed stronger conditions on developers.
Community verdict
11 VOTESRated by people, not pundits.● OPEN
People in this story
SWIPE →
Sam T. Liccardo
D · CA-16
House lawmaker criticizing the Ratepayer Protection Act and proposing conditions for faster data-center grid connections
PRIMARY SUBJECT
Robert E. Latta
R · OH-5
House lawmaker advocating that data centers pay their own infrastructure costs and supporting the Ratepayer Protection Act
Latta's version of this story ↗ALSO MENTIONED Harry K. Sideris, Duke Energy president and CEO describing agreements requiring data centers to cover infrastructure costs; Ted Trabue, Interim chairman of the District of Columbia Public Service Commission describing electricity-cost pressures; Tristan Abbey, U.S. Energy Information Administration administrator discussing new electricity reporting
Discussion · 0
What's your take?
Loading comments…