'Just, Wow!': Scathing Report Blows Open the Secret Moves Trump Pulled to Stop the Epstein Fallout — Then Massie Drops a Brutal Gut Check Trump Wants Deleted Instantly
The article reports allegations that Trump’s allies tried to impede the Epstein files effort and highlights Massie’s criticism of Trump.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYAtlanta Black Star is an identifiable publisher with an attributed author, but this article uses a highly sensational presentation and relies substantially on another outlet’s reporting and reader reactions. The page provides limited evidence of independent verification or a response from the people criticized.
- Source type — A digital news outlet, but this article's presentation is markedly sensational.
- Transparency — The article identifies The Atlantic as the source of the underlying report.
- Editorial standards — The page offers little indication of independent corroboration or a response from the White House.
- Author attribution — A named author is provided.
The article identifies The Atlantic as the source of the central allegations and includes some attributed statements and specific details. However, it leans heavily on that report and online comments, gives little corroborating evidence or response from those criticized, and uses inflammatory framing.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article attributes the central allegations to The Atlantic and quotes Massie, but it does not present a response from Trump or the White House. Reader comments criticizing Trump further reinforce the one-sided presentation.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Trump or the White House is included.
- Loaded language — The headline and narration use strongly charged wording.
- Source diversity — The article relies mainly on an attributed report, Massie and online readers.
- Opinion vs reporting — It is presented as reporting, but the framing and selected reactions favor one interpretation.
The framing is strongly critical of Trump, using loaded language and foregrounding allegations of a pressure campaign and diversion. Massie’s criticism is presented prominently, while the article offers no response from Trump or the White House.
- Language tone — The headline and article use phrases such as “scathing,” “brutal” and “underhanded tactics.”
- Framing — The article presents the alleged effort to block disclosure and Massie’s criticism as the central narrative.
- Source selection — It foregrounds Massie’s statements and readers’ critical reactions.
- Omission — It does not include a response from Trump or the White House to the allegations.
Atlanta Black Star reports on allegations that Trump allies tried to discourage Rep. Thomas Massie and others from pushing for release of the Epstein files. Massie also criticized Trump in a social media post and spoke against U.S. military action in Iran; the House rejected a related war powers resolution.
The article recounts a report by The Atlantic alleging that Trump’s allies sought to weaken Thomas Massie’s effort with Ro Khanna to advance the Epstein Files Transparency Act, including by offering jobs to members of Massie’s staff. It says Republican Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Nancy Mace and Lauren Boebert also supported the bill. Massie described the effort as a “360-pressure campaign.”
Massie later posted that bombing a country would not make the Epstein files go away. The article also reports that the House rejected a war powers resolution on Iran, 219-212, after Massie argued that Congress should decide whether the United States enters another war.
Community verdict
27 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President criticized over alleged efforts to block release of the Epstein files
Representative and advocate for releasing the Epstein files; co-sponsor of the Iran war powers resolution
Massie's version of this story ↗Representative from South Carolina who voiced support for the Epstein Files Transparency Act
Representative from Colorado who voiced support for the Epstein Files Transparency Act
Representative who worked with Massie on the Epstein Files Transparency Act
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





