Nancy Mace fires back at Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer after he mentions her in court while slamming prosecution for suggesting he attacked holdout juror
Mace said she stood by her call for Lindsay Clancy’s execution and accused Clancy’s attorney of targeting the holdout juror.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates AOL.com, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
AOL is an established digital publisher, and the article has an author byline and attributes key claims and quotations. The text gives limited detail about the outlet’s reporting process or corrections practices.
- Source type — An established national digital publisher, though this article is a short entertainment-and-politics style report.
- Author attribution — The article names an author.
- Editorial standards — The article attributes statements to their speakers but offers limited evidence of original verification.
- Transparency — The article names CNN and the BBC as sources for some information, but provides little detail about its own reporting.
The article provides attributed quotations from the hearing and Mace’s responses, plus basic procedural context. It largely follows Mace’s allegations without a response from Reddington or additional independent evidence about whether he targeted the juror.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Reddington’s explanation and Mace’s allegations, but gives substantially more space to Mace’s response and does not include a further reply from Reddington or independent substantiation of the claims about the juror.
- Counterarguments presented — Reddington’s courtroom explanation appears, but the article does not report a response to Mace’s later allegations.
- Source diversity — The account relies mainly on the attorney’s courtroom remarks and Mace’s own statements.
- Framing — The story is organized around Mace’s rebuttal.
- Loaded language — Some charged wording appears in quoted statements, with attribution.
The report uses a largely straightforward account of the exchange and presents quotations from both Mace and Reddington. Its focus on Mace’s response does not, by itself, establish a partisan lean.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive, though the headline’s phrase “fires back” frames the exchange as a confrontation.
- Source selection — Includes Reddington’s courtroom remarks as well as Mace’s responses.
- Framing — Centers on Mace’s reaction to being mentioned in court.
Republished
Republished from Soapcentral. The relationship between the two publishers has not been determined.
Not enough stories yet: 2 of 10.
Rep. Nancy Mace responded to defense attorney Kevin Reddington after he invoked her comments about the holdout juror in court, saying she stood by calling for Lindsay Clancy’s execution. The dispute unfolded at a hearing on the case’s next steps after a mistrial.
After a hung jury led to a mistrial in Lindsay Clancy’s case, a court hearing addressed motions concerning public comments and juror information. Prosecutors sought to protect information about the holdout juror, while the defense sought to make juror notes and sidebar discussions public. Reddington said his comments were reactions to public criticism, including comments by Donald Trump, Nancy Mace and Cruz.
Mace responded in an X post and on CNN, saying Reddington had targeted the lone juror and that she believed he played a part in that. She also argued that a gag order should apply to Clancy’s defense attorney until the court decides whether there will be a retrial. The article reports that the next hearing was scheduled for November 2 and that prosecutors had not decided whether to pursue a retrial.
Community verdict
6 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative responding to a defense attorney’s comments about the holdout juror
President referenced by Reddington as one of the public figures whose comments he was reacting to
Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSAt a hearing in the Lindsay Clancy case, her attorney mentioned Nancy Mace in connection with Mace’s calls for Clancy’s execution. Mace responded by reiterating her call and criticizing the attorney. Center outlets focus on the court exchange over Mace’s execution call, including her criticism of the attorney.
- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 3
- AVG CRED
- 74
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

