Opinion: Dereliction of an oath of office
Kampnich argues that Sullivan’s silence over Hegseth and Trump’s performance is a dereliction of his oath.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Anchorage Daily News is an established regional newspaper with professional editorial operations. This is a signed opinion essay, so its publication reflects the outlet’s willingness to present a viewpoint, not independent verification of all the author’s claims.
- Source type — Established regional newspaper; a generally credible institutional source.
- Editorial standards — The piece is explicitly labeled as opinion, distinguishing commentary from news reporting.
- Author attribution — Named author and a brief biographical identification are provided.
The essay makes specific and consequential allegations about military leadership and a war but supplies little documentary support or sourcing in the text. It presents no response from the criticized officials or competing perspective, consistent with an advocacy-oriented opinion piece rather than reported analysis.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a one-sided opinion essay condemning Sullivan, Hegseth and Trump. It includes no response from those criticized, counterargument, or independent sourcing for the allegations.
- Counterarguments presented — No defense or response from the officials criticized appears.
- Source diversity — The argument is presented through the author’s assertions, without other sources or documents.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is explicitly an opinion essay and advocates electoral consequences for Sullivan.
The essay uses strongly critical language about the Republican administration and Sen. Sullivan, and explicitly urges voters to remove Sullivan from office. Its framing is distinctly left-leaning in its criticism of these Republican officials.
- Language tone — Uses emphatic condemnations, including describing Sullivan’s conduct as a dereliction and the war as a catastrophic failure.
- Framing — Frames Republican officials’ actions and silence as damaging to institutions and national defense.
- Headline — The headline frames the subject as a failure of official duty.
Michael Kampnich argues that Sen. Dan Sullivan enabled Pete Hegseth’s appointment as defense secretary and has failed to hold Hegseth or President Trump accountable. He calls Sullivan’s silence a dereliction of his oath and urges voters to retire him in November.
In an opinion essay, Michael Kampnich criticizes Sen. Dan Sullivan for enabling Pete Hegseth’s appointment as secretary of defense and for not publicly challenging Hegseth or President Trump. Kampnich notes that Hegseth was confirmed by the Senate in a 50-50 vote, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tiebreaker.
Kampnich alleges that Hegseth’s leadership has harmed the armed services and that a war urged on by Hegseth has become a costly stalemate without an acceptable exit strategy. He argues that Sullivan’s silence amounts to a dereliction of his oath and says Sullivan should retire in November.
Community verdict
10 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Alaska senator criticized for enabling Hegseth’s appointment and not publicly holding him or Trump accountable.
Secretary of defense whose appointment and leadership are criticized by the author.
Hegseth's version of this story ↗President who appointed Hegseth and is criticized alongside Sullivan for the administration’s performance.
Vice president who cast the tiebreaking vote in Hegseth’s Senate confirmation.
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



