Alaska's U.S. senators split in vote calling for end to Iran war
Murkowski joined Democrats and three other Republicans in supporting the Senate resolution.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Anchorage Daily News is an established regional newspaper with an attributed reporter and identifiable local reporting. The article includes senators’ office statements and identifies a BBC report for a historical comparison, though it offers limited independent sourcing.
- Source type — Established local newspaper reporting on Alaska's U.S. senators.
- Author attribution — A reporter is named.
- Transparency — The report attributes positions to senators' offices and identifies the source of a historical claim.
The article provides the vote tally, explains the senators’ differing rationales through attributed statements, and places the vote in its congressional and diplomatic context. It relies heavily on office statements and does not include independent expert analysis or a fuller account of the administration’s position.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article reports the senators’ opposing votes and explains the rationales each side offered. Its account relies on statements from their offices and provides little independent assessment of the war or the administration’s claims.
- Source diversity — Both Alaska senators' positions are presented, but the explanation rests mainly on their offices' statements.
- Counterarguments presented — The article includes both the argument for presidential authority and Murkowski's reasons for supporting the resolution.
- Omitted context — There is limited independent context on the war and the administration's position.
The report uses mostly neutral language, attributes the senators’ positions, and describes both sides of the Alaska delegation’s split without clear partisan framing.
- Language tone — The wording is largely descriptive, including calling the measure symbolic.
- Source selection — The article gives each Alaska senator's position and rationale.
- Framing — It frames the story around a split vote and its congressional context.
The Senate passed a largely symbolic resolution calling on President Donald Trump to remove U.S. forces from Iran, with Lisa Murkowski voting for it and Dan Sullivan against it. The vote highlighted a split between Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress.
The Senate approved the war powers resolution by a 50-48 vote. Murkowski joined most Democrats and three other Republican senators in supporting it; Sullivan voted against it. The House had approved the same resolution earlier in the month. The article says the measure likely does not carry the force of law and came as the war neared its fifth month.
Murkowski had initially opposed the resolution, citing risks to U.S. troops and civilians and Trump’s authority under a 60-day threshold. She later began supporting it, saying that limit had passed and the administration had asserted hostilities had ended. Sullivan’s office said he supports presidential authority to protect U.S. security interests and described Iran as a longstanding threat.
Community verdict
37 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Alaska senator who voted against the war powers resolution
Sullivan's version of this story ↗Senator who voted for the resolution
Alaska representative who had voted against the measure in the House
President whose administration was asked to withdraw U.S. forces from Iran
Senator absent for the vote
Senator who voted for the resolution
Senator absent for the vote
Senator who voted for the resolution
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








