Skip to main content
4 min read

Supreme Court rejects a Trump-backed Missouri congressional map for the third time

The map dispute reshaped Cleaver’s district, and he welcomed the ruling that left its prior boundaries in place.

Supreme Court rejects a Trump-backed Missouri congressional map for the third time
Image · ABC15 Arizona in Phoenix (KNXV)

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityABC15 Arizona in Phoenix (KNXV)76/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 1, 2026
tl;dr

The Supreme Court rejected the latest effort to use Missouri’s new congressional map, leaving the state’s 2022 districts in place for the midterm election. The ruling ends a dispute that had affected ballot assignments and targeted Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s district.

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
Emanuel Cleaver D · MO-5
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting Cleaver in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Cleaver’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

SWIPE →

Missouri representative whose district was targeted by the new map

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who backed the new Missouri map

Missouri representative and plaintiff in the federal lawsuit

Republican House candidate and plaintiff seeking use of the new map

ALSO MENTIONED  Denny Hoskins, Missouri secretary of state involved in the referendum dispute; Mike Kehoe, Missouri governor who urged the revised map; Richard von Glahn, Executive director of People Not Politicians Missouri; Stephen Clark, U.S. district judge who issued an order favoring the new map

Part of a bigger story

6 OUTLETS
Supreme Court Rejects Use of Trump-Backed Missouri Congressional Map

Outlets agree that the Supreme Court rejected an effort to use Missouri’s 2025 congressional map for the November 2026 election, leaving the 2022 boundaries in place, including for Emanuel Cleaver’s district. Left-leaning outlets foreground the map’s partisan aim and the legal grounds for opposing its use, while noting that Cleaver’s district remains under the prior boundaries. Center outlets emphasize the ruling’s procedural and election effects, including which districts will be used and candidates’ reactions.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…