Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for FettermanCongress / Members

Markwayne Mullin's nomination to be DHS secretary narrowly clears Senate committee with Democratic support

Fetterman’s vote supplied the Democratic support that helped Mullin’s nomination advance.

Markwayne Mullin's nomination to be DHS secretary narrowly clears Senate committee with Democratic support
Image · ABC News

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityABC News84/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 8, 2026
ABC News
Mar 19, 2026
tl;dr

Markwayne Mullin’s nomination to lead the Department of Homeland Security advanced out of the Senate committee by an 8-7 vote, with Democrat John Fetterman voting in favor. The nomination now heads to the full Senate, where a vote could come as early as next week.

Community verdict

18 VOTES
How does this story look for
John Fetterman D · PA · SEN
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
John Fetterman
D · PA · SEN

Senator who voted to advance Mullin’s nomination

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Markwayne Mullin
Secretary of Homeland Security

Nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security

Mullin's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who fired DHS Secretary Kristi Noem

Kristi Noem
Former U.S. Representative (R-SD)

Former DHS secretary

Rand Paul
R · KY · SEN

Senate committee chairman who voted against Mullin’s nomination

Part of a bigger story

19 OUTLETS
Senate Committee Advances Markwayne Mullin’s Nomination

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee advanced Markwayne Mullin’s nomination to lead DHS, 8-7, with John Fetterman providing the only Democratic vote in favor. Left-leaning outlets center Democratic backlash and present Fetterman’s vote as controversial. Center outlets emphasize the committee vote and next Senate step, while also reporting criticism of Fetterman and Mullin. Right-leaning outlets present Fetterman’s break with Democrats as pivotal support for Mullin, with some also focusing on criticism of his vote.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…