Susan Collins Slammed for Saying, "I Do Not Understand How Anyone Would Take the Word of a Felon"
Collins denied wrongdoing and questioned the credibility of a convicted former contractor executive.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe publisher is a blog, and this brief article primarily recaps reporting by ProPublica and ABC News rather than presenting substantial original reporting. The named author provides some transparency, but the text offers little evidence about the outlet’s editorial or correction practices.
- Source type — A blog, which provides a lower institutional-credibility prior than an established newsroom.
- Track record — The article relies chiefly on reporting by other outlets rather than showing substantial original reporting.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
- Transparency — The text gives no information about correction practices or editorial standards.
The article attributes the core allegations and includes denials from Collins and Reed, as well as an FBI spokesperson’s reported statement. It is brief and largely derivative, and its emphasis on social media reactions offers limited independent context or verification.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article reports the allegations and includes denials from Collins and Reed, along with a reported FBI statement that the investigation found nothing implicating Collins or her campaign. Its focus on critical social media reactions and lack of further context leave the treatment only partly balanced.
- Counterarguments presented — Collins and Reed deny key aspects, and the article reports the FBI spokesperson’s account of the investigation.
- Source diversity — The account refers to ProPublica, ABC News, Collins, Reed, and social media users, but does not independently report the underlying claims.
- Framing — The headline and closing emphasis on online criticism tilt attention toward the hypocrisy charge.
The framing centers on criticism of Collins and presents social media users’ hypocrisy charge prominently. It also includes Collins’s denial, Reed’s denial, and the reported FBI finding, but the overall emphasis tilts against Collins.
- Headline — The headline foregrounds criticism of Collins for her statement.
- Framing — The article emphasizes the hypocrisy accusation tied to Trump’s conviction.
- Source selection — It includes social media criticism as well as denials and a reported statement from an FBI spokesperson.
Susan Collins denied allegations described in a ProPublica report and questioned the credibility of a convicted former contractor executive whose account figures in them. The article highlights social media users’ claims that her comments were hypocritical because President Trump was also convicted of felonies.
ProPublica reported that Scott Reed, who headed a super PAC supporting Collins, allegedly sought a $500,000 donation from executives of military contractor Navatek in 2019. Former Navatek CEO Martin Kao later contributed $150,000 through a shell company, and told investigators Reed said Collins would know the source of the money and Navatek would receive additional federal contracts. Reed denied discussing Kao or Navatek with Collins or her staff. Collins denied wrongdoing and called the ProPublica article a “partisan hit job.”
Collins said she did not understand how anyone would trust Kao, whom she described as a twice-convicted felon and liar. The article reports that social media users called her comments hypocritical, citing Trump’s 2024 conviction on 34 felony counts. It also cites ABC News reporting that an FBI spokesperson said an earlier investigation found nothing implicating Collins or her campaign.
Community verdict
23 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senator responding to allegations involving her campaign and criticizing the credibility of a key source
President cited in social media users’ comparison with Collins
Part of a bigger story
24 OUTLETSProPublica reported allegations linking Collins, a defense contractor, federal contracts and campaign contributions, and described an FBI inquiry; Collins denied wrongdoing. Left-leaning outlets emphasize the alleged contract-and-donation links and the reported end of the FBI inquiry. Center outlets generally pair the allegations with Collins’s denials, while also tracking campaign effects and scrutinizing claims. Right-leaning outlets focus on Collins’s rebuttal and challenge the report’s timing, sourcing or credibility.
- ARTICLES
- 28
- OUTLETS
- 24
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


