Democrat Senator Who Backed "Friend" Markwayne Mullin Sees DHS Secretary Standing Up To Stephen Miller
Heinrich explained his vote for Mullin, citing their working relationship and his belief that Mullin would act independently.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe publisher is identified as a blog, which provides a weaker institutional credibility signal than an established newsroom. The article names an author and includes attributed statements, but offers little information about editorial standards or corrections.
- Source type — Recorded as a blog, with less institutional accountability than an established news organization.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Editorial standards — The page provides no clear information about editorial standards.
- Correction history — No correction policy or history is evident in the article.
The article gives a clear vote tally and attributes Heinrich’s rationale to his statements. It is brief and relies heavily on one senator’s account, with little independent context or opposing perspective.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article provides Heinrich’s explanation and his criticism of Noem, but offers little independent context or response from Mullin, the administration, or senators who opposed confirmation.
- Counterarguments presented — No opposing senator or administration response is included.
- Source diversity — The reporting relies primarily on Heinrich’s statements and a brief account of the vote.
- Loaded language — Most charged descriptions are attributed to Heinrich or identified as criticism by lawmakers.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is presented as a report, though its framing gives substantial space to Heinrich’s viewpoint.
The article mainly reports the vote and attributes the supporting rationale to Heinrich. Its wording includes some skepticism about Mullin’s independence, but does not establish a clear partisan lean.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive, with the qualified phrase “purported independence.”
- Source selection — Heinrich’s explanation is prominent, but the article does not present a clear partisan argument.
- Framing — The story centers on a Democratic senator’s vote and rationale without a strong verdict.
The Senate confirmed Markwayne Mullin as Homeland Security secretary in a 54-45 vote, with Martin Heinrich and John Fetterman the only Democrats voting yes. Heinrich said he supported Mullin because of their friendship and his belief that Mullin would act independently of Stephen Miller.
The Senate confirmed Markwayne Mullin as Homeland Security secretary, replacing Kristi Noem. Martin Heinrich and John Fetterman were the only Senate Democrats to vote for confirmation. Heinrich had previously criticized Noem’s tenure and said her departure “couldn’t have come soon enough.”
Heinrich said his vote might surprise some people because he considers Mullin a friend, despite their disagreements, and values their constructive working relationship. He also said he believed Mullin would not be bullied into changing his views or take orders from Stephen Miller.
Community verdict
32 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Secretary of Veterans Affairs
President
Secretary of Energy
Senator who voted to confirm Markwayne Mullin
Former Homeland Security secretary
Homeland Security secretary confirmed by the Senate
Secretary of the Interior
Secretary of State
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








