Search people, articles, bills, and more
“Amendment SA 3113, as modified, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 15 - 81. Record Vote Number: 477.”
This amendment attempted to reduce the amount of money spent on several agricultural, rural development, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) programs. It was rejected by the Senate, so the funding levels in the main bill were not lowered.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
“Amendment SA 3113, as modified, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 15 - 81. Record Vote Number: 477.”
This amendment attempted to reduce the amount of money spent on several agricultural, rural development, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) programs. It was rejected by the Senate, so the funding levels in the main bill were not lowered.
This amendment represented a push to decrease federal spending on rural infrastructure, food safety, and agricultural support; its failure means those programs are likely to maintain their proposed funding levels.
The proposed cuts would have most directly affected farmers, rural residents relying on development grants, and the agencies responsible for food and drug safety.