Search people, articles, bills, and more
“On agreeing to the Roy amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 204 - 217 (Roll no. 354).”
This amendment tried to create a more specific definition for the environmental impacts that require a major federal study. It was intended to limit when these detailed, often lengthy reviews are triggered, but the House voted against adding it to the bill.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
An amendment numbered 6 printed in House Report 119-410 to define further what significant effects will trigger an Environmental Impact Statement.
“On agreeing to the Roy amendment (A003) Failed by recorded vote: 204 - 217 (Roll no. 354).”
This amendment tried to create a more specific definition for the environmental impacts that require a major federal study. It was intended to limit when these detailed, often lengthy reviews are triggered, but the House voted against adding it to the bill.
Environmental reviews are often the longest part of the permitting process for roads, bridges, and energy projects; defining 'significant effects' more narrowly is a key strategy for those who want to speed up construction by reducing the number of projects that need the most intensive level of study.
This would have primarily affected construction companies and energy developers by potentially reducing their paperwork, while environmental advocacy groups would have been affected by the change in how nature is protected during project planning.