Search people, articles, bills, and more
“On agreeing to the Waters amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 214 - 215 (Roll no. 327). (consideration: CR H5792)”
This amendment tried to stop investment advisors and brokers from charging hidden or unfairly high fees. It failed to pass by a single vote, meaning these specific fee restrictions were not added to the larger bill.
No reactions yet. Be the first to weigh in.
An amendment numbered 5 printed in Part B of House Report 119-399 to define and prohibit fees charged by SEC-registered individuals and entities that are not clearly disclosed or proportional to the services provided.
“On agreeing to the Waters amendment (A005) Failed by recorded vote: 214 - 215 (Roll no. 327). (consideration: CR H5792)”
This amendment tried to stop investment advisors and brokers from charging hidden or unfairly high fees. It failed to pass by a single vote, meaning these specific fee restrictions were not added to the larger bill.
The amendment was intended to lower costs for individual investors by ensuring they aren't surprised by hidden charges when managing their savings or retirement accounts.
This would have primarily affected everyday Americans who hire financial advisors or use investment platforms to manage their money.